Notifications
Clear all
In what way was the administration of the Company different from that of Indian rulers?
From Trade to Territory
1
Posts
2
Users
0
Likes
324
Views
0
22/05/2021 12:43 pm
Topic starter
In what way was the administration of the Company different from that of Indian rulers?
Answer
Add a comment
Add a comment
Topic Tags
1 Answer
0
22/05/2021 12:44 pm
The administration of the Company was different from that of the Indian rulers in the following ways:
- The Company divided its administrative units called Presidencies. There were three Presidencies - Bengal, Madras and Bombay. In India, districts were the main administrative units.
- Each presidency was ruled by a Governor. Districts were ruled by the Collectors.
- The supreme head of the administration of the Company was the Governor-General. But in India, the head of the administration was the king. .
- The main job of the Governor-General was to introduce administrative reforms while the main job of the Collector was to collect revenue and taxes and maintain law and order in his district.
Add a comment
Add a comment
Forum Jump:
Related Topics
-
The Maratha power was crushed in the third Anglo-Maratha war. Tipu Sultan disallowed local merchants from trading with the Company.
4 years ago
-
What is it? (ii) Where is it kept? (iii) When did the British take it way?
4 years ago
-
Identify the person above. (ii) When was he appointed the Governor of Bengal?
4 years ago
-
They have enticed several merchants and others to go and take protection under them. (i) What intention did the English traders show initially?
4 years ago
-
How did the East India Company begin to trade in Bengal?
4 years ago
Forum Information
- 321 Forums
- 27.3 K Topics
- 53.8 K Posts
- 124 Online
- 12.4 K Members
Our newest member: Stripchat
Forum Icons:
Forum contains no unread posts
Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons:
Not Replied
Replied
Active
Hot
Sticky
Unapproved
Solved
Private
Closed