A species-area curve is drawn by plotting the number of species against the area. How is it that when a very large area is considered the slope is steeper than that for smaller areas?
A species-area curve is drawn by plotting the number of species against the area. How is it that when a very large area is considered the slope is steeper than that for smaller areas?
Ecologists have discovered that the value of Z (slope of the line) lies in the range of 0.1 to 0.2, regardless of the taxonomic group or the region (whether it is the plants in Britain, birds in California or molluscs in New York state, the slopes of the regression line are amazingly similar). But, if you analyse the species-area relationships among very large areas like the entire continents, you will find that the slope of the line to be much steeper (Z values in the range of 0.6 to 1.2). For example, for frugivorous (fruit-eating) birds and mammals in the tropical forests of different continents, the slope is found to be 1.15.
-
The relation between species richness and area for a wide variety of taxa turns out to be a rectangular hyperbola. Give a brief explanation.
3 years ago
-
Explain briefly the ‘rivet popper hypothesis’ of Paul Ehrlich.
3 years ago
-
Species diversity decreases as we move away from the equator towards the poles. What could be the possible reasons?
3 years ago
-
Describe the consumptive use value of biodiversity as food, drugs and medicines, fuel and fiber with suitable examples.
3 years ago
-
What is an ecosystem service? List any four important ecosystem services provided by the natural ecosystems. Are you in favour or against levying a charge on the service provided by the ecosystem?
3 years ago
- 321 Forums
- 27.3 K Topics
- 53.8 K Posts
- 0 Online
- 12.4 K Members