Notifications
Clear all
Which of the following cannot be explained by Lamarckism?
0
24/09/2020 4:54 pm
Topic starter

Which of the following cannot be explained by Lamarckism?
(a) Absence of lips in snakes
(b) Longneck of giraffe
(c) Degeneration of visual apparatus in cave dwellers
(d) Dull progeny of noble laureate
Answer
Add a comment
Add a comment
1 Answer
0
24/09/2020 4:55 pm

(d) Dull progeny of noble laureate
Explanation:
According to Lamarck, during the lifetime of an organism new characters are developed due to internal vital forces, effect of environment, new needs, use and disuse of organs. These acquired characters are inherited from one generation to another. According to him, intelligence should also be inherited and so it fails to explain dull progeny of nobel laureate.
Add a comment
Add a comment
Forum Jump:
Related Topics
-
Assertion: Organic compounds first evolved in earth required for origin of life were protein and nucleic acid.
5 years ago
-
Assertion: Natural selection is the outcome of difference in survival and reproduction among individuals
5 years ago
-
Assertion: Jave Ape-man, Peking man and Heidelberg man are the fossils of Homo erectus.
5 years ago
-
Assertion: The primitive atmosphere was reducing one i.e., without oxygen.
5 years ago
-
Assertion: The earliest fossil form in the phylogeny of horse is eohippus.
5 years ago
Forum Information
- 321 Forums
- 27.3 K Topics
- 53.8 K Posts
- 7 Online
- 12.4 K Members
Our newest member: Stripchat
Forum Icons:
Forum contains no unread posts
Forum contains unread posts
Topic Icons:
Not Replied
Replied
Active
Hot
Sticky
Unapproved
Solved
Private
Closed